Presumably unlike single user incentivized to select whatever they are used to they are instead liable to pick the best platform.Īftershot Pro, Lightworks, Maya, Bloom all seem to be pretty good. Pixar is an interesting case because as pioneers in their field they made a lot of their own tools and run them on Linux.
NETWORKING DIGIKAM MAC
I would guess more people use Windows and Mac because it is the path of least resistance and presumably they are more heavily invested in learning their art and the many complexities of the tools required. getting a midi board for editing) didn't really get me anywhere, but the Adobe cloud + iPad just did the trick for me. I feel that all the tricks I used to get me to develop more on the desktop (e.g. I love to take pictures, but post-processing is not exactly my favourite activity. Without that feature I wouldn't have considered this approach. Although this has some inconveniences - it's just dumped into a folder without any regard for organisation - it prevents a complete vendor lock-in. When I fire up Lightroom classic on the desktop, it downloads everything (originals) I've uploaded on the iPad from the Lightroom cloud. Nowadays however, I have a subscription for Lightroom and can import the photos on my iPad and edit them on the go, or from the comfort of my couch. I'd come back from holidays and didn't really make the time, I guess it can be attributed to laziness. One thing that kept me from post-processing a lot of my pictures was the necessity of doing it on the desktop. I agree with the sentiment on the new Lightroom being trash, although I do think something nice came out of Adobe's efforts of the past few years. The features are more or less there, the UX isn't.
NETWORKING DIGIKAM SOFTWARE
Overall photo editing with open source software is kind of a drag.
navigation keys are different between modes), it isn't good at actualling keeping a library of photos, and crucially it has no way to quickly go to 100/200/400 % magnification (in LR you could hold the middle mouse button to instantly snap to 400 % iirc, extremely useful, completely absent in darktable). GIMP only did 8 bit color until recently and a lot of operations are comically slow, while darktable has a very low legibility UI and keyboard shortcuts that don't make a lot of sense (e.g.
Darktable has similar issues to GIMP, as in, that it hypothetically has a lot of features, but the usability is pretty poor overall, and it lacks some pretty vital things. Although LR used to have the habit of getting really slow with larger libraries, it mostly just works and doesn't get in the way, while stuff like darktable is just. I haven't seen anything open source that comes close to Lightroom, even if you only consider LR versions from ten years ago.
0 kommentar(er)
